PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN TANDA TANGAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor : 2045/pid.B/2010/PN.Sby)

Jaka , Adipura (2012) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN TANDA TANGAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor : 2045/pid.B/2010/PN.Sby). Undergraduate thesis, Faculty of Law.

[img]
Preview
PDF (cover - bab 1) - Published Version
Download (559Kb) | Preview
    [img] PDF (bab 2 - daftar pustaka) - Published Version
    Restricted to Repository staff only

    Download (425Kb)

      Abstract

      Grow up of current knowledge led to the whole society comfortable by these developments, so that people prefer the instant and quickly in any case, where it causes more people to violate the law emilih m, mi sal in megesahkan a letter, the more choose falsifying signatures to treat c epat perjanjia process or manufacture of the letter . This study aims to find out about the accountability of perpetrators of criminal acts of forgery, which it aims to discuss factors - factors fraud perpetrators of criminal acts and forms forged the signatures of legal entanglement for signature forgery. This study uses sociological juridical methodology. Source data used are secondary data that can be a primary law materials such as hu Act - Act of 1945, materials hu secondary law works - scientific papers, draft laws - laws, and also the results - the results of a study, materials such as bibliographies tertiary hu law, dictionaries and other - other. Analysis of data obtained using qualitative analysis of the data asking to source. The results can be summarized in the form factor - the drivers of the perpetrator in committing a fraud include economic factors, factors and factor law enforcement science and technology, type - type of signature forgery itself is included in the forged letter of Article 263 paragraph depend on 1 of the Criminal Code and Sporiuous Signature or signature essay, forged the signatures are also included in the types of fraud as our letter n. P er t counterweight judge in deciding a case of follow forged the signatures, which include behavioral considerations such as the defendant, the defendant's mental condition, state of the defendant and the defendant's identity. Different’s decision judges away with a maximum sentence of paragraph 1 of article 263 of the Criminal Code, whereas fig Desc six years in case the decision number: 2045/Pid.B/2010/Pn.Sby, my only sanctioned form of confinement for 3 months in prison. Keywords: Liability, Forgery Signature

      Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
      Subjects: K Law > K Law (General) > K520 Comparative law. International uniform law > K3150 Public law
      K Law > K Law (General) > K520 Comparative law. International uniform law > K3150 Public law
      K Law > K3150 Public law
      Divisions: Faculty of Law > Science of Law
      Depositing User: Fitri Yulianto
      Date Deposited: 04 Apr 2014 09:14
      Last Modified: 04 Apr 2014 09:15
      URI: http://eprints.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/5319

      Actions (login required)

      View Item